BSI PD ISO/TR 23476:2021
$215.11
Ergonomics. Application of ISO 11226, the ISO 11228 series and ISO/TR 12295 in the agricultural sector
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2021 | 144 |
This document is intended to be used alongside ISO/TR 12295, ISO 11226 and the ISO 11228 series in the agricultural sector. This document gives information on how existing standards can be used in a global sector such as agriculture where, albeit with different characteristics, biomechanical overload is a relevant aspect, WMSDs are common and specific preventive actions are needed.
The proposed project aims to:
-
define the user(s) and fields for its application (including non-experts in ergonomics);
-
provide examples of procedures for hazard identification, risk estimation or evaluation and risk reduction in different agricultural settings, through:
-
more synthetic procedural schemes (main test);
-
more analytical explanations of the procedures, through mathematical models and application examples, also with the use of specific free simple tools, in:
-
Annex A (pre-mapping with ERGOCHECK);
-
Annex B (evaluation of Multitask risk of biomechanical overload on typical agricultural macro-cycles, considering upper limbs repetitive movements, manual lifting and carrying, pushing-pulling);
-
Annex C (study of awkward postures with criteria derived from the actual standards and scientific literature as TACOS method).
-
-
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
7 | Foreword |
8 | Introduction |
11 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions |
12 | 4 General outline of work processes in an annual multi-task analysis in agriculture 4.1 General structure of a multi-task analysis |
13 | 4.2 Study of tasks distribution over the year and search for groups of workers who are homogeneous in terms of risk exposure 4.2.1 General 4.2.2 Macrocycle duration |
14 | 4.2.3 Phases and tasks identification |
16 | 4.2.4 Identification of the different homogeneous groups |
18 | 5 First levels: pre-mapping of danger and discomfort through key questions and quick assessment 5.1 Foreword |
19 | 5.2 The pre-mapping model |
22 | 6 Analytical study of work processes in annual multi-task analysis: description of a typical working day for each month and quantitative task distribution over the year 6.1 General 6.2 Phase A – Description of a typical working day |
23 | 6.3 Phase B – Estimation of total number of hours worked every month of the year |
24 | 6.4 Phase C – Assignment of tasks to a homogeneous group (or individual worker) and calculation of proportional tasks duration in each individual month |
26 | 7 Annual multi-task risk assessment of biomechanical overload for the upper limbs 7.1 General 7.2 Phase A – Analysis of each individual task using the OCRA checklist to calculate the intrinsic risk score and prepare the tasks basic risk evaluation for each crop |
28 | 7.3 Phase B – Application of mathematical models and preliminary preparation of “artificial working day” representative of the whole year and of every month of the same year |
31 | 8 Annual multi-task risk assessment for working postures 8.1 The meaning of postural tolerance |
32 | 8.2 Analysing the tolerability of working postures for the spine when performing manual lifting tasks, and for the upper limbs when performing repetitive movements and manual lifting: specific International Standards 8.3 Analysing spinal working postures without manual load lifting and lower limb postures (primarily static) |
33 | 8.4 The TACOS method: contents and criteria for back and lower limb posture analysis |
34 | 8.5 Posture analysis of a multi-task job performed on a full-time or part-time basis with yearly job rotation |
41 | 9 Annual multi-task risk assessment of manual material handling (MMH) and carrying |
45 | 10 Annual multi-task risk assessment of pushing and pulling |
48 | 11 Manual material carrying (MMC) risk assessment 12 Conclusions |
50 | Annex A (informative) Initial identification and preliminary assessment (pre-mapping) of potential risks: criteria and presentation of a specific simple tool that allows its application |
79 | Annex B (informative) Criteria and mathematical models for analysing exposure to biomechanical overload in multitask jobs featuring complex macro-cycles (e.g. weekly, monthly, annual turnover) |
117 | Annex C (informative) Criteria to evaluate working postures of the spine and lower limbs using the TACOS strategy in daily or other macro-cycle multi-task analysis: brief presentation |
140 | Bibliography |