{"id":137788,"date":"2024-10-19T07:57:54","date_gmt":"2024-10-19T07:57:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/fema-p-154-2015\/"},"modified":"2024-10-25T00:09:02","modified_gmt":"2024-10-25T00:09:02","slug":"fema-p-154-2015","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/fema\/fema-p-154-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"FEMA P 154 2015"},"content":{"rendered":"
None<\/p>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2<\/td>\n | Blank Page <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
8<\/td>\n | Blank Page <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
9<\/td>\n | 03-FEMA P-154-TableofContents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
15<\/td>\n | 04-FEMA P-154-ListofFigures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
26<\/td>\n | Blank Page <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
27<\/td>\n | 05-FEMA P-154-ListofTables <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
29<\/td>\n | 06-FEMA P-154-Chapter1 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
47<\/td>\n | 07-FEMA P-154-Chapter2 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
49<\/td>\n | Structure Bookmarks Figure 2-1 Rapid visual screening implementation sequence. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
51<\/td>\n | Table 2-1 Key Players in an RVS Program <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
61<\/td>\n | Figure 2-2 .Input tool for determining site-specific seismicity using the USGS online tool (USGS, 2013a). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
62<\/td>\n | Figure 2-3 Output summary report from USGS online tool for determining site-specific seismicity (USGS, 2013a). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
66<\/td>\n | Table 2-3 RVS Benchmark Years for FEMA Building Types (based on ASCE\/SEI 41-13) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
67<\/td>\n | Table 2-4 Quick Reference Guide from Appendix B <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
71<\/td>\n | Figure 2-4 Sanborn map and corresponding aerial photograph of a city block. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
72<\/td>\n | Figure 2-5 Key to Sanborn map symbols. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
74<\/td>\n | Figure 2-7 .Example of property details from City of Calabasas municipal database (from ). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
76<\/td>\n | Table 2-5 Soil Type Definitions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
77<\/td>\n | Figure 2-8 .VS map of Alaska from USGS website showing soil type (USGS, 2013b). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
79<\/td>\n | Table 2-6 Checklist of Field Equipment Needed for Rapid Visual Screening <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
82<\/td>\n | Blank Page <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
83<\/td>\n | 08-FEMA P-154-Chapter3 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
84<\/td>\n | Structure Bookmarks Figure 3-1 Level 1 Data Collection Form (High seismicity). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
85<\/td>\n | Figure 3-2 .Building Identification Information portion of Level 1 Data Collection Form. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
89<\/td>\n | Figure 3-4 .Photograph and Sketch portions of the Level 1 Data Collection Form. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
90<\/td>\n | Figure 3-5 Sample sketches and photos. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
92<\/td>\n | Figure 3-6 Occupancy portion of the Level 1 Data Collection Form. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
95<\/td>\n | Figure 3-9 Building with potential landslide hazard. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
96<\/td>\n | Figure 3-11 Definition of separation gap between adjacent buildings. Figure 3-12 Schematic illustration of floors not aligning vertically. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
97<\/td>\n | Figure 3-13 Schematic illustration of buildings of different height. Figure 3-14 Schematic illustration of end buildings. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
99<\/td>\n | Figure 3-16 Illustration of a building on a sloping site. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
100<\/td>\n | Figure 3-17 Schematic illustration of a W1 building with cripple wall. Figure 3-18 Schematic illustration of a W1 building with occupied space over a garage. Figure 3-19. Schematic illustration of building with a soft-story condition where parking requirements result in large openings. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
101<\/td>\n | Figure 3-20. Illustration of a building with a soft ground story due to large openings and narrow piers. Figure 3-21 Illustration of a building with a soft ground story due to tall piers. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
102<\/td>\n | Figure 3-22 Illustration of a building with out-of-plane setback at the third story. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
103<\/td>\n | Figure 3-23. Illustration of a building with out-of-plane setback where the upper floors cantilever out over the smaller ground story footprint. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
104<\/td>\n | Figure 3-24 Illustration of a building with an in-plane setback. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
105<\/td>\n | Figure 3-25 Schematic illustrations of buildings with short columns due to: Figure 3-26 Schematic illustration of a split level irregularity. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
106<\/td>\n | Figure 3-27 Building with multiple vertical irregularities: setbacks and a soft first story. Figure 3-28 Illustration of a building without a plan irregularity. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
107<\/td>\n | Figure 3-29 Illustration of a building with the torsion plan irregularity due to the C-shaped configuration of walls at the ground floor. Figure 3-30. Illustration of a corner building with the torsion plan irregularity due to L-shaped configuration of walls at the ground floor due to windows on two sides (visible in figure) and solid walls on two sides (hidden in the figure). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
108<\/td>\n | Figure 3-31 Building with a plan irregularity (non-parallel systems) due to its triangular footprint. Figure 3-32. Plan views of various building configurations showing reentrant corners and large diaphragm openings; arrows indicate possible areas of damage. Figure 3-33 Building with a plan irregularity with two wings meeting at right angles. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
109<\/td>\n | Figure 3-34 Illustration of a building with a reentrant corner plan irregularity. Figure 3-35 Schematic illustration of large diaphragm openings. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
110<\/td>\n | Figure 3-36. Schematic illustration of a building with beams that do not align with columns. Figure 3-37 .Illustration of a building with parapets and other potential falling hazards, including canopy over loading dock and water tank on roof. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
111<\/td>\n | Figure 3-38. Exterior Falling Hazards portion of the Level 1 Data Collection Form. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
118<\/td>\n | Table 3-1 FEMA Building Type Descriptions, Basic Scores, and Performance in Past earthquakes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
119<\/td>\n | Table 3-1 FEMA Building Type Descriptions, Basic Scores, and Performance in Past earthquakes (continued) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
120<\/td>\n | Table 3-1 FEMA Building Type Descriptions, Basic Scores, and Performance in Past earthquakes (continued) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
121<\/td>\n | Table 3-1 FEMA Building Type Descriptions, Basic Scores, and Performance in Past earthquakes (continued) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
122<\/td>\n | Table 3-1 FEMA Building Type Descriptions, Basic Scores, and Performance in Past earthquakes (continued) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
123<\/td>\n | Table 3-1 FEMA Building Type Descriptions, Basic Scores, and Performance in Past earthquakes (continued) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
124<\/td>\n | Table 3-1 FEMA Building Type Descriptions, Basic Scores, and Performance in Past earthquakes (continued) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
125<\/td>\n | Table 3-1 FEMA Building Type Descriptions, Basic Scores, and Performance in Past earthquakes (continued) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
126<\/td>\n | Table 3-1 FEMA Building Type Descriptions, Basic Scores, and Performance in Past earthquakes (continued) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
127<\/td>\n | Table 3-1 FEMA Building Type Descriptions, Basic Scores, and Performance in Past earthquakes (continued) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
129<\/td>\n | Figure 3-40. Typical frame structure. Features include large window spans, Figure 3-41. Typical bearing wall structure. Features include small window span, at least two mostly solid walls, and thick load-bearing walls. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
131<\/td>\n | Figure 3-42 Interior view showing fire-proofed columns and beams, which indicate a steel building (S1, S2, or S4). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
132<\/td>\n | Figure 3-43 .Interior view showing concrete columns and girders with no identifiable shear walls, which indicates a concrete moment frame (C1). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
134<\/td>\n | Figure 3-44 Illustration of a horizontal addition. Figure 3-45 Illustration of a vertical addition. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
136<\/td>\n | Table 3-2 Level 1 Reference Guide for Reviewing Buildings with Horizontal Additions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
139<\/td>\n | Figure 3-47 Extent of Review portion of the Level 1 Data Collection Form. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
140<\/td>\n | Figure 3-48. Level 2 screening results portion of the Level 1 Data Collection Form. Figure 3-49 Other Hazards portion of the Level 1 Data Collection Form. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
141<\/td>\n | Figure 3-50 Action Required portion of the Level 1 Data Collection Form. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
143<\/td>\n | 09-FEMA P-154-Chapter4 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
144<\/td>\n | Structure Bookmarks Figure 4-1 Optional Level 2 Data Collection Form. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
146<\/td>\n | Figure 4-3 Portion of the Level 2 High seismicity Data Collection Form for adjusting the baseline score. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
148<\/td>\n | Figure 4-4. Illustration of a building with a ground floor story height that is twice the height of the stories above. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
149<\/td>\n | Figure 4-5 Illustration of a building with a ground floor story height that is <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
150<\/td>\n | Figure 4-6 .Illustration of a building with short piers. Figure 4-7 .Illustration of a building with piers that are less than one half as deep as the spandrels. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
152<\/td>\n | Figure 4-8 Illustration of a building with a reentrant corner. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
153<\/td>\n | Figure 4-9 .Rigid wall, flexible diaphragm building with short wall at small reentrant corner. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
154<\/td>\n | Figure 4-10 Illustration of floors not aligning vertically. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
155<\/td>\n | Figure 4-11 Illustration of a building that is two or more stories taller than the adjacent building. Figure 4-12 Illustration of end buildings. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
156<\/td>\n | Table 4-1 Building Additions Reference Guide <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
157<\/td>\n | Table 4-1 Building Additions Reference Guide (continued) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
159<\/td>\n | Figure 4-13 Illustration of a URM building with a gable end wall. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
162<\/td>\n | Figure 4-14 Portion of the Level 2 form for nonstructural hazards. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
165<\/td>\n | 10-FEMA P-154-Chapter5 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
181<\/td>\n | 11-FEMA P-154-Chapter6 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
189<\/td>\n | 12-FEMA P-154-Chapter7 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
191<\/td>\n | Structure Bookmarks Table 7-1 RVS Budget for Anyplace, USA <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
192<\/td>\n | Figure 7-1 .Property information at example site in city\u2019s geographic information system (FEMA, 2002a). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
193<\/td>\n | Figure 7-2 .USGS web page showing SS and S1 values for MCER ground motions (USGS, 2013a). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
195<\/td>\n | Figure 7-3 Customized Level 1 Data Collection Form for Anyplace, USA. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
196<\/td>\n | Table 7-2 Customized Quick Reference Guide for Anyplace, USA <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
198<\/td>\n | Figure 7-4 .Partially completed Building Identification portion of the Data Collection Form for a sample site for use by the screener. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
200<\/td>\n | Figure 7-5 Exterior view of 3703 Roxbury Street. Figure 7-6 Close-up view of 3703 Roxbury Street exterior showing perimeter braced steel framing. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
204<\/td>\n | Figure 7-9 .Close-up view of 3711 Roxbury Street building showing exterior infill frame construction. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
206<\/td>\n | Figure 7-10 Completed form for 3711 Roxbury Street. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
207<\/td>\n | Figure 7-11 Exterior view of 5020 Ebony Drive. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
209<\/td>\n | Figure 7-12 Completed Data Collection form for 5020 Ebony Drive. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
210<\/td>\n | Figure 7-13 Exterior view of 1450 Addison Avenue. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
211<\/td>\n | Figure 7-14 Completed Data Collection Form for 1450 Addison Avenue. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
213<\/td>\n | Table 7-3 RVS Budget for Any State, USA <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
217<\/td>\n | Figure 7-15 .Exterior view of modern reinforced brick masonry building at Roosevelt Elementary School. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
218<\/td>\n | Figure 7-16 Completed Level 1 Data Collection Form for the main building at Roosevelt Elementary School. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
219<\/td>\n | Figure 7-17 Completed Level 2 Data Collection Form for the main building at Roosevelt Elementary School. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
220<\/td>\n | Figure 7-18 .Photo of exterior of Washington Middle School (from ). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
224<\/td>\n | Figure 7-21. Exterior view portable classrooms at New City High School (from ). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
226<\/td>\n | Figure 7-22 Completed Level 1 Data Collection Form for portable classrooms at New City High School. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
227<\/td>\n | Figure 7-23 Completed Level 2 Data Collection Form for portable classrooms at New City High School. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
230<\/td>\n | Table 7-4 Summary of Paper-Based and Electronic Scores <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
231<\/td>\n | 13-FEMA P-154-AppendixA <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
244<\/td>\n | Blank Page <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
245<\/td>\n | 14-FEMA P-154 AppendixB <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
264<\/td>\n | Blank Page <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
265<\/td>\n | 15-FEMA P-154-AppendixC <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
269<\/td>\n | 16-FEMA P-154-AppendixD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
276<\/td>\n | a. Building above is a high-rise steel dual system: moment frame (heavy columns and beams on upper fa\u00e7ade) with bracing around elevator core. Fireproofing is being applied to steel at mid-height (inside the shroud) and precast fa\u00e7ade elements are being attached to frame in lower stories. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
277<\/td>\n | Table D-4 Most Likely FEMA Building Types for Pre-1930 Buildings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
278<\/td>\n | Table D-5 Most Likely FEMA Building Types for 1930-1945 Buildings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
279<\/td>\n | Table D-6 Most Likely FEMA Building Types for 1945-1960 Buildings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
280<\/td>\n | Table D-7 Most Likely FEMA Building Types for Post-1960 Buildings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
281<\/td>\n | Figure D-2 Building with exterior columns covered with a fa\u00e7ade material. Figure D-3 Detail of the column fa\u00e7ade of Figure D-2. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
282<\/td>\n | Figure D-4 .Building with both shear walls (in the short direction) and frames (in the long direction). Figure D-5 Regular, full-height joints in a building\u2019s wall indicate a concrete tilt-up. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
284<\/td>\n | Figure D-8 A 1970s renovated fa\u00e7ade hides a URM bearing wall structure. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
285<\/td>\n | Figure D-9 A concrete shear wall structure with a 1960s renovated fa\u00e7ade. Figure D-10 URM wall showing header courses (identified by arrows) and two washer plates indicating wall anchors. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
286<\/td>\n | Figure D-11 .Drawing of two types of masonry pattern showing header bricks (shown with stipples) (Allen, 1985). Figure D-12 .Diagram of common reinforced masonry construction (Allen, 1985). Bricks are left out of the bottom course at intervals to create cleanout holes, then inserted before grouting. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
287<\/td>\n | Figure D-13 Brick veneer panels. Figure D-14 Hollow clay tile wall with punctured tile. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
288<\/td>\n | Figure D-15 Sheet metal siding with masonry pattern. Figure D-16 Asphalt siding with brick pattern. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
289<\/td>\n | Figure D-17 Pre-1940 cast-in-place concrete with formwork pattern. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
290<\/td>\n | Blank Page <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
291<\/td>\n | 17-FEMA P-154-AppendixE <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
292<\/td>\n | Structure Bookmarks Figure E-1 .Single family residence (an example of the W1 identifier, light wood frame single- or multiple-family dwellings of one or more stories in height). Figure E-2 Multi-unit, multistory residential wood frame structure with plan areas on each floor of greater than 3,000 square feet (W1A). Figure E-3 .Larger wood framed structure, typically with room-width spans (W2, commercial and industrial wood frame buildings greater than 5,000 square feet). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
293<\/td>\n | Figure E-4 Drawing of wood stud frame construction (Lagorio et al., 1986). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
294<\/td>\n | Figure E-5 Stud wall, wood framed house. Figure E-6 Drawing of timber pole framed house (FEMA, 1987). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
295<\/td>\n | Figure E-7 Timber pole framed house. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
296<\/td>\n | Figure E-8 House off its foundation, 1983 Coalinga earthquake. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
297<\/td>\n | Figure E-9 Failed cripple stud wall, 1992 Big Bear earthquake. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
298<\/td>\n | Figure E-10 Seismic strengthening of a cripple wall, with plywood sheathing. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
300<\/td>\n | Figure E-11 Drawing of steel moment-resisting frame building (Steinbrugge, 1982). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
301<\/td>\n | Figure E-12 Braced frame configurations (FEMA, 1987). Figure E-13 Braced steel frame, with chevron and diagonal braces. The braces <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
302<\/td>\n | Figure E-14 Chevron bracing in steel building under construction. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
304<\/td>\n | Figure E-15 .Retrofit of a concrete parking structure using exterior X-braced steel frames. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
305<\/td>\n | Figure E-16 Use of a braced frame to rehabilitate an unreinforced masonry building. Figure E-17 Drawing of light metal construction. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
306<\/td>\n | Figure E-18 Prefabricated metal building (S3, light metal building). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
308<\/td>\n | Figure E-19 Drawing of steel frame with interior concrete shear walls (Steinbrugge, 1982). Figure E-20 Concrete shear wall on building exterior. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
309<\/td>\n | Figure E-21. Close-up of exterior shear wall damage during a major earthquake. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
310<\/td>\n | Figure E-22 Drawing of steel frame with URM infill (Lagorio et al., 1986). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
311<\/td>\n | Figure E-23 Example of steel frame with URM infill walls (S5). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
314<\/td>\n | Figure E-24 Drawing of concrete moment-resisting frame building (Lagorio et al., 1986). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
315<\/td>\n | Figure E-25 .Extreme example of ductility in concrete, 1994 Northridge earthquake. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
316<\/td>\n | Figure E-26. Example of ductile reinforced concrete column, 1994 Northridge earthquake; horizontal ties would need to be closer for greater demands. Figure E-27 .Concrete moment-resisting frame building (C1) with exposed concrete, deep beams, wide columns (and with architectural window framing). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
317<\/td>\n | Figure E-28 Locations of failures at beam-to-column joints in nonductile frames, 1994 Northridge earthquake. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
319<\/td>\n | Figure E-29 Drawing of concrete shear wall building (Lagorio et al., 1986). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
320<\/td>\n | Figure E-30 Tall concrete shear wall building: walls connected by damaged spandrel beams. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
321<\/td>\n | Figure E-31 Shear wall damage, 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
322<\/td>\n | Figure E-32 Concrete frame with URM infill. Figure E-33. C3 building and detail showing concrete frame with URM infill (left wall), and face brick (right wall). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
324<\/td>\n | Figure E-34 .Drawing of tilt-up construction typical of the western United States. Tilt-up construction in the eastern United States may incorporate a steel frame (Lagorio et al., 1986). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
325<\/td>\n | Figure E-35 Tilt-up industrial building, 1970s. Figure E-36 Tilt-up industrial building, mid- to late-1980s. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
326<\/td>\n | Figure E-37 Tilt-up construction anchorage failure. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
327<\/td>\n | Figure E-38. Result of failure of the roof beam anchorage to the wall in tilt-up building. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
328<\/td>\n | Figure E-39 Newly installed anchorage of roof beam to wall in tilt-up building. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
329<\/td>\n | Figure E-40 Drawing of precast concrete frame building (Lagorio et al., 1986). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
330<\/td>\n | Figure E-41 .Typical precast column cover on a steel or concrete moment frame. Figure E-42. Exposed precast double-Tee sections and overlapping beams are indicative of precast frames. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
331<\/td>\n | Figure E-43 Example of precast double \u201cT\u201d section during installation. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
332<\/td>\n | Figure E-44. Precast structural cross; installation joints are at sections where bending is minimum during high seismic demand. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
333<\/td>\n | Figure E-45 Modern reinforced brick masonry. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
336<\/td>\n | Figure E-46 Drawing of unreinforced masonry bearing wall building, two-story (Lagorio et al., 1986). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
337<\/td>\n | Figure E-47 Drawing of unreinforced masonry bearing wall building, four-story (Lagorio et al., 1986). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
338<\/td>\n | Figure E-48 Drawing of unreinforced masonry bearing wall building, six-story (Lagorio et al., 1986). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
339<\/td>\n | Figure E-49 East Coast URM bearing wall building. Figure E-50 West Coast URM bearing wall building. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
340<\/td>\n | Figure E-51 Drawings of typical window head features in URM bearing wall buildings (Packard, 1981). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
341<\/td>\n | Figure E-52 .Parapet failure leaving an uneven roof line, due to inadequate anchorage, 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
342<\/td>\n | Figure E-53 Damaged URM building, 1992 Big Bear earthquake. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
347<\/td>\n | 18A-FEMA P-154-AppendixF <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
355<\/td>\n | 18B-FEMA P-154-AppendixG <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
366<\/td>\n | Blank Page <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
367<\/td>\n | 19-FEMA P-154-Glossary and Abbreviations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
372<\/td>\n | Blank Page <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
374<\/td>\n | Blank Page <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
375<\/td>\n | 20-FEMA P-154-References <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
382<\/td>\n | Blank Page <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
386<\/td>\n | Blank Page <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
387<\/td>\n | Blank Page <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
388<\/td>\n | 22-FEMA P-154-Back Cover <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" FEMA P-154 – Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards A Handbook, Third Edition<\/b><\/p>\n |